Rachel Carson responsible for the deaths of millions of African children

Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring has had a global impact on the public’s view of environmental health. The book exposed the world to the details of how pesticides negatively impact the environment. Her efforts ultimately led to the ban of the pesticide DDT here in the U.S. as well as in many countries worldwide. Although we scientifically know that the reduction in DDT use is related to improved health outcomes, we still see much opposition of its ban globally. Some of the harshest claims that have been made regarding the ban of DDT are that it has killed millions of individuals in Africa. This is because DDT was thought to be the most effective pesticide for killing malaria harboring mosquitoes, and the ban of DDT led to an increase in the mosquito population as well as the cases of malaria. Many harsh critics blame Rachel Carson and her environmental movement for this spike in mosquitoes in Africa.  People claim that her book led to the ban of DDT which in turn allowed for the mosquito population to increase dramatically. These same people believe that DDT was the cure for the problem and she encouraged taking it away. These critics are failing to address the reality of pesticide resistance in mosquito populations. Mosquitoes are rapidly evolving, not just behaviorally to avoid DDT and other pesticides, but also genetically to resists it affects. This reality shows us that the ban of DDT is not the reason for the increase in mosquitoes; it is that they are becoming resistant to chemical pesticides in general. Malaria has killed millions of individuals over time and it is important to devise a strategy for reduction that does not suffer from the same resistance mechanisms that chemical pesticides have. Her book led to a global change in the use of DDT as a pesticide and has since improved health outcomes. It is important for us to understand the reasoning in such horrible claims by her opponents so that we can understand its lack of credibility. The key defense against her opponents is the reality of pesticide resistance, and the more we learn about this reality, the better we can justify radical changes in public health policy.